Re: collations in shared catalogs?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: collations in shared catalogs?
Date: 2015-05-19 03:36:10
Message-ID: 3474.1432006570@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2015-05-18 23:22:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm inclined to think I should revert b82a7be603f1811a and instead make
>> the seclabel provider columns use text_pattern_ops. That would fix
>> their collation problem with less of a backwards compatibility hazard.

> Sounds good to me. Are you doing that or should I?

I can deal with it, but not till maana.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-05-19 03:39:41 Re: a few thoughts on the schedule
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-05-19 03:34:16 Re: a few thoughts on the schedule