Re: Proposed Query Planner TODO items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: markw(at)osdl(dot)org
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, jenny(at)osdl(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposed Query Planner TODO items
Date: 2004-02-16 19:23:42
Message-ID: 345.1076959422@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

markw(at)osdl(dot)org writes:
> It looks like we have indexes on all of the date columns except
> l_commitdate, which appears to be in Q4.

> So I think I'll run against the CVS tip as is, again with an index on
> l_commitdate, and then another test to confirm your theory. Sound good?

Sure, it's only cycles ;-). I am not certain that an index on
commitdate would help any, but it's worth trying.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-02-16 20:07:53 Re: Replication eRServer problems
Previous Message John Li 2004-02-16 19:08:49 Re: Slow DROP INDEX