Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Did we want this patch applied? Not enough demand?
It seems a bit overengineered at this point. I realize Andy wasn't the
one pushing to support arbitrary-length passwords originally, but I
can't see adding this much code for that. I don't even see the value
of allowing them to be more than 100 characters ...
regards, tom lane