Re: Roadmap for a Win32 port

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Roadmap for a Win32 port
Date: 2002-06-19 12:45:43
Message-ID: 3447.1024490743@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> Like what?

> The biggie is that pg_ctl reports the postmaster to have started
> successfully without ever checking. And the "wait" option is broken and
> not trivial to fix.

Indeed, but how will it help to merge the two executables into one?
I don't think you can simply postpone the fork() until all setup
is complete --- that would mean you don't know the final postmaster
PID until much too late.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-06-19 13:06:31 Re: ecpg and bison again
Previous Message Tony Griffiths(RA) 2002-06-19 09:37:20 Missing library files??