Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 11:36 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> ... I don't see why this case is different,
>> especially when the added cost compared to HEAD is not much more than
>> one C function call.
> Well, I explained why *I* thought it was different, but obviously you
> don't agree.
After mulling it over for awhile, I still think the extra checking
is appropriate, especially since this patch is enlarging the set of
things that can happen in parallel mode. How do you want to proceed?
regards, tom lane