Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests
Date: 2022-08-04 13:43:26
Message-ID: 3438999.1659620606@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Yes. I've attached patches for backbranches.

FWIW, I'd recommend waiting till after next week's wrap before
pushing these. While I'm definitely in favor of doing this,
the odds of introducing a bug are nonzero, so right before a
release deadline doesn't seem like a good time.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2022-08-04 14:02:28 Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-08-04 13:41:05 Re: fix typos