| From: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com" <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers |
| Date: | 2022-08-09 10:39:02 |
| Message-ID: | 34308245-ea21-82ee-b1fd-00b4766f3527@amazon.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 8/9/22 11:17 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 12:43:14PM +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
>> but I'm not sure we should do it as a first step (given the fact that this
>> is not Port->authn_id that is passed down to the parallel workers in the
>> SYSTEM_USER patch).
>>
>> What do you think about working on both (aka a) v11-002 only
>> ClientConnectionInfo and b) SYSTEM_USER) in parallel?
> It seems to me that completing ClientConnectionInfo first has the
> advantage of not having to tweak twice the interface we are going to
> use when passing down the full structure to the workers, so I would
> choose for doing it first (with one field for the authn, and a second
> field for the auth method so as the the workers can build SYSTEM_USER
> by themselves when required).
Yeah fair point.
Agree that it makes sense to work on those patches in this particular
order then.
Thanks,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-08-09 10:54:27 | Re: Using each rel as both outer and inner for JOIN_ANTI |
| Previous Message | r.zharkov | 2022-08-09 10:29:00 | Re: Checking pgwin32_is_junction() errors |