Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> (That patch is assuming that we're looking for something simple to
> back-patch, in the event that we decide not to just revert the
> graceful shutdown patch from back branches. Reverting might be a
> better idea for now, and then we could fix all this stuff going
> forward.)
FWIW, I'm just fine with reverting, particularly in the back branches.
It seems clear that this dank corner of Windows contains even more
creepy-crawlies than we thought.
regards, tom lane