Re: Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rolf Østvik <rolfostvik(at)yahoo(dot)no>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14
Date: 2007-01-02 15:07:24
Message-ID: 3425.1167750444@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

=?iso-8859-1?q?Rolf=20=D8stvik?= <rolfostvik(at)yahoo(dot)no> writes:
> If you (Tom) still want me to do the following steps
> then please tell me.

Please --- I'm still curious why the estimated cost changed so much from
7.4 to 8.2. I can believe a marginal change in cost leading to a plan
switch, but comparing the total-cost numbers shows that 8.2 must think
that indexscan is a whole lot more expensive than 7.4 did, which seems
odd. For the most part 8.2 ought to think nestloop-with-inner-indexscan
is cheaper than 7.4 did, because we now account for caching effects across
repeated iterations of the inner scan.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Haile 2007-01-02 16:22:13 Config parameters
Previous Message Jeremy Haile 2007-01-02 14:58:43 Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS