Re: Missing TAG for FEB (current) Minor Version Release

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Sujit(dot)Rathod(at)fujitsu(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Nitin(dot)Kale(at)fujitsu(dot)com, Nikita(dot)Y(dot)Sagar(at)fujitsu(dot)com, Baskaran(dot)Venkatesan(at)fujitsu(dot)com, Ishwar(dot)Bhoge(at)fujitsu(dot)com
Subject: Re: Missing TAG for FEB (current) Minor Version Release
Date: 2023-02-08 03:38:24
Message-ID: 3413975.1675827504@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 11:14:48AM +0000, Sujit(dot)Rathod(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
>> Could you please confirm when we can expect the TAG created for all minor versions?

> You might be interested to read this earlier question:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/2e5676ba-e579-09a5-6f3a-d68208052654%40captnemo.in

FYI, I pushed the tags about four hours ago, following our customary
schedule.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com 2023-02-08 03:51:08 RE: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2023-02-08 03:26:01 Re: windows CI failing PMSignalState->PMChildFlags[slot] == PM_CHILD_ASSIGNED