Re: Open issues for HOT patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Open issues for HOT patch
Date: 2007-09-18 13:52:56
Message-ID: 3413.1190123576@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> But then what happens when you want to update a second tuple on the same
>> page? None of our existing plan types release and reacquire pin if they
>> don't have to, and I really doubt that we want to give up that
>> optimization.

> You will prune when you lock the page and at that point unless you got
> enough room for both tuples I doubt trying just before the second tuple
> is going to help.

No, you're missing the point completely. If the free space on the page
is, say, 1.5x the average tuple size, the code *won't* prune, and then
it will be stuck when it goes to do the second tuple update, because
there is no chance to reconsider the prune/no-prune decision after some
space is eaten by the first update.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2007-09-18 13:59:42 Re: Open issues for HOT patch
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-09-18 13:24:02 Re: invalidly encoded strings