Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure
Date: 2006-09-01 13:44:04
Message-ID: 3409.1157118244@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> writes:
> Is it worth looking into the overflow and subtraction issues for 8.2?
> It seems to me they're bugs rather than features. Or are these 8.3
> since it's so late?

IMHO they're bugs not new features, and therefore perfectly fair game
to work on during beta. But for the moment I'd suggest staying focused
on the interval_mul/interval_div roundoff issue.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Glaesemann 2006-09-01 13:54:39 Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2006-09-01 13:16:45 DOC: catalog.sgml

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Glaesemann 2006-09-01 13:54:39 Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2006-09-01 13:16:45 DOC: catalog.sgml