| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How about a psql backslash command to show GUCs? |
| Date: | 2022-04-07 20:35:59 |
| Message-ID: | 3400691.1649363759@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> čt 7. 4. 2022 v 19:04 odesílatel David G. Johnston <
> david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> napsal:
>> \dconfig[+] gets my vote. I was going to say "conf" just isn't common
>> jargon to say or write; but the one place it is - file extensions - is
>> relevant and common. But still, I would go with the non-jargon form.
> dconfig is better, because google can be confused - dconf is known project
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dconf
Looks like the consensus has shifted to \dconfig. I'll do it like that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yedil Serzhan | 2022-04-07 20:40:44 | GSOC proposal for Improve pgarchives by Yedil |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-04-07 20:27:59 | Re: Preventing indirection for IndexPageGetOpaque for known-size page special areas |