Re: documentation structure

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: documentation structure
Date: 2024-03-22 13:35:47
Message-ID: 33e82e2a-3954-4c1e-8114-ffbd8dfb5293@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22.03.24 13:50, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 7:37 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>> On 20.03.24 17:43, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> 0001 removes the "Installation from Binaries" chapter. The whole thing
>>> is four sentences. I moved the most important information into the
>>> "Installation from Source Code" chapter and retitled it
>>> "Installation".
>>
>> But this separation was explicitly added a few years ago, because most
>> people just want to read about the binaries.
>
> I really doubt that this is true.

Here is the thread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CABUevExRCf8waYOsrCO-QxQL50XGapMf5dnWScOXj7X%3DMXW--g%40mail.gmail.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2024-03-22 13:36:19 Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded
Previous Message Andrey M. Borodin 2024-03-22 13:27:49 Re: [PATCH] Add sortsupport for range types and btree_gist