Re: Problems with database bloat

From: "Alex Turner" <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problems with database bloat
Date: 2006-06-11 04:27:33
Message-ID: 33c6269f0606102127g2f0ef08aye92c7ad64657156e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I suspect that my manualy vacuum every 10 days or so really wasn't nearly
enough ;)

Alex

On 6/9/06, Jim C. Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> wrote:
>
> This tells me that you need to be vacuuming more. Autovac is your
> friend.
>
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:14:01PM -0400, Alex Turner wrote:
> > Yeah - I just did a reindex, that fixed the indexes at least.
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > On 6/8/06, Jim C. Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > >On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 06:03:23PM -0400, Alex Turner wrote:
> > >> I hope I'm reading this query wrong:
> > >>
> > >> trend=# select relname, relpages*8192/reltuples from pg_class where
> > >> reltuples>0 order by relpages desc limit 10;
> > >> relname | ?column?
> > >> -------------------------------+------------------
> > >> property | 19935.4468376195
> > >> result_entry_pkey | 1611.15654062026
> > >> result_entry | 1417.71707157196
> > >> person | 7107.41684585612
> > >> property_feature_pkey | 98.7810833557521
> > >> property_feature | 60.2035684051268
> > >> person_name_i | 3358.93641334398
> > >> property_price_i | 1978.89907374882
> > >> property_mls_listing_number_i | 1923.61833274788
> > >> property_spatial | 1784.73493686332
> > >> (10 rows)
> > >>
> > >> If I have this query right in my head, this means that the average
> tuple
> > >in
> > >> the property relation is taking up 19k? and the average tuple in the
> > >> result_entry_pkey index is take 1.5k?!
> > >>
> > >> Is there a way I can get the database to coalesce free space? A
> vacuum
> > >> verbose shows that I have enough entries in the free space map...
> > >
> > >A lazy vacuum won't reclaim empty space, only a VACUUM FULL will.
> > >
> > >If that drops the size of the relations substantially, you'll probably
> > >want to REINDEX everything to reclaim lost space in the indexes as
> well.
> > >--
> > >Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
> > >Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
> > >vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
> > >
>
> --
> Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
> Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
> vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Kretschmer 2006-06-11 07:38:53 Re: Questions about indexes
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-06-11 03:15:14 Re: [GENERAL] TOAST not working