Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?

From: "Alex Turner" <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: "Riccardo Inverni" <riccardo(dot)inverni(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?
Date: 2006-05-30 21:46:48
Message-ID: 33c6269f0605301446m175a85bagb4071748ac8b4cc0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

SAS and SATA will give you the best throughput for your array total. U320
is limited to 320MB/channel.

Alex

On 5/30/06, Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 16:28, Riccardo Inverni wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I have to update a Linux box with PostgreSQL on it, essentially for
> > data warehousing purposes. I had set it up about 3 years ago and at
> > that time the best solution I had been recommended was to use SCSI
> > disks with hardware RAID controllers.
> >
> > Is this still the way to go or things have recently changed? Any
> > other suggestion/advice? What about SAN?
>
> Actually, modern SATA server drives are now considered competitive with
> the proper RAID controller.
>
> Nowadays most people seem to recommend the Areca controllers. I haven't
> used them myself, but would be happy to test them some day.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ben 2006-05-30 21:54:39 Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2006-05-30 21:39:33 Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?