Re: Sustained inserts per sec ... ?

From: Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sustained inserts per sec ... ?
Date: 2005-04-01 21:20:46
Message-ID: 33c6269f050401132052019918@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Oh - this is with a seperate transaction per command.

fsync is on.

Alex Turner
netEconomist

On Apr 1, 2005 4:17 PM, Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 1250/sec with record size average is 26 bytes
> 800/sec with record size average is 48 bytes.
> 250/sec with record size average is 618 bytes.
>
> Data from pg_stats and our own job monitoring
>
> System has four partitions, two raid 1s, a four disk RAID 10 and a six
> disk RAID 10.
> pg_xlog is on four disk RAID 10, database is on RAID 10.
>
> Data is very spread out because database turnover time is very high,
> so our performance is about double this with a fresh DB. (the data
> half life is probably measurable in days or weeks).
>
> Alex Turner
> netEconomist
>
> On Apr 1, 2005 1:06 PM, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > Just curious, but does anyone have an idea of what we are capable of? I
> > realize that size of record would affect things, as well as hardware, but
> > if anyone has some ideas on max, with 'record size', that would be
> > appreciated ...
> >
> > Thanks ...
> >
> > ----
> > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> > Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
> >
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vivek Khera 2005-04-01 21:23:13 Re: Follow-Up: How to improve db performance with $7K?
Previous Message Alex Turner 2005-04-01 21:17:19 Re: Sustained inserts per sec ... ?