From: | Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
Cc: | Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>, Yann Michel <yann-postgresql(at)spline(dot)de>, gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Date: | 2005-01-11 14:23:38 |
Message-ID: | 33c6269f05011106235da6723e@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Connect to an external data system using a socket and propagate data
changes using a trigger... I've had to do this, and it sucks to be
stuck in Oracle!
Alex Turner
NetEconomist
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:29:52 -0600, Jim C. Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:46:01PM -0500, Alex Turner wrote:
> > You sir are correct! You can't use perl in MS-SQL or Oracle ;).
>
> On the other hand, PL/SQL is incredibly powerful, especially combined
> with all the tools/utilities that come with Oracle. I think you'd be
> hard-pressed to find too many real-world examples where you could do
> something with a PostgreSQL procedural language that you couldn't do
> with PL/SQL.
> --
> Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
> Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
>
> Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
> Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
> FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2005-01-11 14:30:53 | Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL? |
Previous Message | Rosser Schwarz | 2005-01-11 13:58:34 | Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL? |