From: | Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org> |
Cc: | Yann Michel <yann-postgresql(at)spline(dot)de>, gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Date: | 2005-01-10 17:46:01 |
Message-ID: | 33c6269f050110094646897c3e@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
You sir are correct! You can't use perl in MS-SQL or Oracle ;).
Alex Turner
NetEconomist
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:42:00 -0600, Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:33:07 +0100
> Yann Michel <yann-postgresql(at)spline(dot)de> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:07:55AM -0500, Alex Turner wrote:
> > > Neither Oracle nor MS-SQL have the range of stored procedure
> > > langauges that Postgresql supports.
> >
> > That is not true. Oracle uses PL/SQL for its stored procedures and
> > M$-SQL does have a stored procedural language.
>
> By "range" I believe he meant number of stored procedure languages.
> He wasn't saying they didn't have a stored procedure langauge or
> support, just that PostgreSQL had more languages to choose from.
>
> ---------------------------------
> Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>
> http://www.wiles.org
> ---------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud | 2005-01-10 20:08:37 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Previous Message | Frank Wiles | 2005-01-10 17:42:00 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |