Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft

From: Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>
Cc: Yann Michel <yann-postgresql(at)spline(dot)de>, gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Date: 2005-01-10 17:46:01
Message-ID: 33c6269f050110094646897c3e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

You sir are correct! You can't use perl in MS-SQL or Oracle ;).

Alex Turner
NetEconomist

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:42:00 -0600, Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:33:07 +0100
> Yann Michel <yann-postgresql(at)spline(dot)de> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:07:55AM -0500, Alex Turner wrote:
> > > Neither Oracle nor MS-SQL have the range of stored procedure
> > > langauges that Postgresql supports.
> >
> > That is not true. Oracle uses PL/SQL for its stored procedures and
> > M$-SQL does have a stored procedural language.
>
> By "range" I believe he meant number of stored procedure languages.
> He wasn't saying they didn't have a stored procedure langauge or
> support, just that PostgreSQL had more languages to choose from.
>
> ---------------------------------
> Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org>
> http://www.wiles.org
> ---------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud 2005-01-10 20:08:37 Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Previous Message Frank Wiles 2005-01-10 17:42:00 Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft