Re: Allow auto_explain to log to NOTICE

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Tom Dunstan <tom(at)tomd(dot)cc>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Allow auto_explain to log to NOTICE
Date: 2018-06-20 18:06:41
Message-ID: 33BBFB94-51E1-477D-9003-F35125CAAA05@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 27 Apr 2018, at 04:24, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2018-04-27 11:52:18 +0930, Tom Dunstan wrote:
>>> I'd argue this should contain the non-error cases. It's just as
>>> reasonable to want to add this as a debug level or such.
>>
>> So all of warning, info, debug and debug1-5?
>
> Yea. Likely nobody will ever use debug5, but I don't see a point making
> that judgement call here.

Did you have a chance to hack up a new version of the patch with Andres’ review
comments? I’m marking this patch as Waiting on Author for now based on the
feedback so far in this thread.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashwin Agrawal 2018-06-20 18:16:14 Re: Avoiding Tablespace path collision for primary and standby
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2018-06-20 17:54:29 Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica / proof of concept