From: | "MauMau" <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Pg Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Does RelCache/SysCache shrink except when relations are deleted? |
Date: | 2011-09-29 13:13:30 |
Message-ID: | 33B435CEAB4146FF83BED284A204FC0B@maumau |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> You don't really know this; some operating systems (Linux in particular)
> does not show shared memory as in use by a process until it is accessed.
> It may very well have well over 1.6 GB of shared_buffers, yet not show
> that in VIRT.
Oh, really? When I started psql just after I set shared_buffers to 2500MB
and ran pg_ctl start, "ps -o vsz -p postgres_PID" showed about 2500MB+some.
ps's vsz is also the amount of virtual memory. But I want to know the
shared_buffers setting.
Anyway, I'd appreciate if anyone could tell me about RelCache/SysCache. As
far as I read the code, PostgreSQL seems to use memory for RelCache/SysCache
without limit until the relations are dropped.
Regards
MauMau
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-09-29 13:39:24 | Re: Does RelCache/SysCache shrink except when relations are deleted? |
Previous Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2011-09-29 13:06:11 | Re: Removing savepointLevel from TransactionState |