Re: Pathify RHS unique-ification for semijoin planning

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pathify RHS unique-ification for semijoin planning
Date: 2025-08-12 16:38:19
Message-ID: 3392836.1755016699@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> writes:
> No review, but apparently "uniquify" is more widely accepted than
> "uniqueify".

Personally I'd write "unique-ify", seeing that neither of the forms
without the dash are considered good English. Of course, if you
need to make identifiers out of this, that solution doesn't work;
but you could just avoid the construction --- say, "make_path_unique"
rather than "uniquify_path".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2025-08-12 16:53:13 Re: index prefetching
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2025-08-12 16:37:54 Re: meson: Add _static and _shared suffixes to the library names