"David Parker" <dparker(at)tazznetworks(dot)com> writes:
> Update activity on this table is going to be pretty intense, and the
> transient nature of the data makes it a good candidate for a temporary
> and/or in-memory table.
> Are there any plans to implement GLOBAL for temporary tables in the near
> future?
No. If you are going to allow multiple backends to access it, I don't
think there are any optimizations possible. Use a regular table.
You can just DROP the thing when you're done.
regards, tom lane