Re: [CORE] 7.4RC2 regression failur and not running stats collector process

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be>, Derek Morr <dvm105(at)psu(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [CORE] 7.4RC2 regression failur and not running stats collector process
Date: 2003-11-14 19:17:27
Message-ID: 3382.1068837447@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> One thing I've not seen an answer to: does Postgres run acceptably on other
> people's Solaris boxes? If this bug is preventing running on Solaris at
> all, I'd say fix it ... Solaris is a major platform. If it only affects
> users of one particular Solaris patch version, then we do a big warning and
> save it for 7.4.1.

I'm sure it depends on which Solaris version you're running, and
possibly on local configuration issues as well. We should not however
assume that the problem occurs *only* on Solaris. My take on a lot of
the IPv6 funnies we've turned up is that they are kernel/userland
compatibility issues (v6-ready libc on non-v6-ready kernel or vice
versa), and that's surely at least as likely on Linux as Solaris.

The regression test that detects the problem was only put in as of
7.4beta3. I'm not sure how many of our existing port reports were
based on prior betas ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message P.J. "Josh" Rovero 2003-11-14 19:19:36 Re: 7.4RC2 regression failur and not running stats collector
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2003-11-14 19:16:56 Re: Help with count(*)