Re: Rethinking opclass member checks and dependency strength

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rethinking opclass member checks and dependency strength
Date: 2020-03-31 20:45:50
Message-ID: 338.1585687550@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Still haven't got a better naming idea, but in the meantime here's
> a rebase to fix a conflict with 612a1ab76.

I see from the cfbot that this needs another rebase, so here 'tis.
No changes in the patch itself.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
am-check-members-callback-5.patch text/x-diff 45.4 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-03-31 20:48:30 Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-03-31 20:32:07 Re: Small docs bugfix: make it clear what can be used in UPDATE FROM and DELETE USING