Re: Shaky coding for vacuuming partitioned relations

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Shaky coding for vacuuming partitioned relations
Date: 2017-09-26 08:59:30
Message-ID: 332fcde5-9e3d-4322-fe8b-31493b4358bc@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/09/26 11:12, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I think that's right, although, I don't see any new RangeVar created under
>> vacuum() at the moment. Maybe, you're referring to the Nathan's patch
>> that perhaps does that.
>
> Yes, you can check what it does here (last version):
> 766556DD-AA3C-42F7-ACF4-5DC97F41F151(at)amazon(dot)com

Thanks, will look.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2017-09-26 09:03:36 Re: Built-in plugin for logical decoding output
Previous Message Amit Langote 2017-09-26 08:59:03 Re: Shaky coding for vacuuming partitioned relations