| From: | Віталій Тимчишин <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Kempter <kevink(at)consistentstate(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Query tuning |
| Date: | 2009-08-20 12:03:07 |
| Message-ID: | 331e40660908200503o1a24aa42pb25210fb59691f88@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
2009/8/19 Kevin Kempter <kevink(at)consistentstate(dot)com>
>
> We do have an index on url_hits.time
>
> not sure why timestamps were not used, I was not here for the design phase.
>
What's type of time column? I don't like it casts it to double in explain.
If it is integer, may be you need to change
and time >= extract ('epoch' from timestamp '2009-08-12')
and time < extract ('epoch' from timestamp '2009-08-13' )
to
and time >= extract ('epoch' from timestamp '2009-08-12')::int4
and time < extract ('epoch' from timestamp '2009-08-13' )::int4
for the index to be used?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ivan Voras | 2009-08-20 12:50:23 | Re: PG 8.3 and server load |
| Previous Message | Fabio La Farcioli | 2009-08-20 08:35:19 | Re: Number of tables |