| From: | Kevin Hunter <hunteke(at)earlham(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Craig A(dot) James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning |
| Date: | 2007-04-30 17:30:05 |
| Message-ID: | 33127762-7EBB-4D1E-9147-5BFB3EB7A883@earlham.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
At 12:18p -0400 on 30 Apr 2007, Craig A. James wrote:
> 1. Generating a resonable starting configuration for neophyte users
> who have installed Postgres for the first time.
I recognize that PostgreSQL and MySQL try to address different
problem-areas, but is this one reason why a lot of people with whom I
talk prefer MySQL? Because PostgreSQL is so "slooow" out of the box?*
Thanks,
Kevin
* Not trolling; I use PostgreSQL almost exclusively.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alain Roger | 2007-04-30 18:21:27 | function and bytea |
| Previous Message | Markus Wollny | 2007-04-30 17:20:12 | Questions about TSearch2 and PG 8.2 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-04-30 19:19:16 | Re: Query performance problems with partitioned tables |
| Previous Message | Steinar H. Gunderson | 2007-04-30 17:23:34 | Re: Query performance problems with partitioned tables |