Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I wonder if we can't find a better solution than bunching TOC entries
> together. Perhaps we don't need every TOC entry in memory
> simultaneously, for instance, especially things like LOBs that don't
> have dependencies.
Interesting idea. We'd have to either read the TOC multiple times,
or shove the LOB TOC entries into a temporary file, either of which
has downsides.
regards, tom lane