From: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: new heapcheck contrib module |
Date: | 2021-01-28 17:50:51 |
Message-ID: | 32B37FF5-7C41-4D43-9CBB-DB357482F162@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Jan 28, 2021, at 9:49 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:40 PM Mark Dilger
> <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Jan 28, 2021, at 9:13 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> If I run pg_amcheck --all -j4 do I get a serialization boundary across
>>> databases? Like, I have to completely finish db1 before I can go onto
>>> db2, even though maybe only one worker is still busy with it?
>>
>> Yes, you do. That's patterned on reindexdb and vacuumdb.
>
> Sounds lame, but fair enough. We can leave that problem for another day.
Yeah, I agree that it's lame, and should eventually be addressed.
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-01-28 17:57:28 | Re: vacuum_cost_page_miss default value and modern hardware |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-01-28 17:49:17 | Re: new heapcheck contrib module |