Re: new heapcheck contrib module

From: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new heapcheck contrib module
Date: 2021-01-28 17:50:51
Message-ID: 32B37FF5-7C41-4D43-9CBB-DB357482F162@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Jan 28, 2021, at 9:49 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:40 PM Mark Dilger
> <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Jan 28, 2021, at 9:13 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> If I run pg_amcheck --all -j4 do I get a serialization boundary across
>>> databases? Like, I have to completely finish db1 before I can go onto
>>> db2, even though maybe only one worker is still busy with it?
>>
>> Yes, you do. That's patterned on reindexdb and vacuumdb.
>
> Sounds lame, but fair enough. We can leave that problem for another day.

Yeah, I agree that it's lame, and should eventually be addressed.


Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-01-28 17:57:28 Re: vacuum_cost_page_miss default value and modern hardware
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-01-28 17:49:17 Re: new heapcheck contrib module