Re: Error-safe user functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Error-safe user functions
Date: 2022-12-15 05:45:57
Message-ID: 3298020.1671083157@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> There are other a bunch of hard errors from get_multirange_io_data(),
> get_range_io_data() and its subroutine can hit, shouldn't we care
> about those?

I think those are all "internal" errors, ie not reachable as a
consequence of bad input data. Do you see a reason to think
differently?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-12-15 05:52:32 Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)
Previous Message Zheng Li 2022-12-15 05:36:41 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs