| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message) |
| Date: | 2010-01-21 23:16:42 |
| Message-ID: | 328E3494-8DDC-4652-B498-3030271F1438@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jan 21, 2010, at 3:05 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Well, we used to have the idea of a feature freeze ... is that going to apply at the end of the commitfest?
>
> I generally agree that we need to have a bit of wiggle room at this stage - small and non-controversial items can be allowed to creep in still.
Seems to me we can have discussion anytime, though a given patch might get more or less discussion at various times. But clearly something like this would just be entered for the first 9.1 commitfest, no?
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2010-01-21 23:18:18 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
| Previous Message | Joachim Wieland | 2010-01-21 23:07:55 | Re: Listen / Notify - what to do when the queue is full |