Re: bug on log generation ?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug on log generation ?
Date: 2022-08-08 15:36:17
Message-ID: 3286ab1d-28de-d8f9-8e35-b160967c5074@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2022-08-08 Mo 11:07, Marcos Pegoraro wrote:
>
> What platform is this on? Is it possible that on some platform the
> chunk
> size we're using is not doing an atomic write?
>
>  
> Until last year we were Ubuntu 16.04 and Postgres 11 with the latest
> minor update.
> This January we changed to Ubuntu 20.04 and Postgres 14, now updated
> to 14.4.
>
> But the problem occured on both old and new SO and Postgres versions.
> Right now I opened the current log file and there are 20 or 30 of
> these statements and all of them are fine, maybe tomorrow the problem
> comes back, maybe this afternoon.
>
>

OK, we really need a repeatable test if possible. Perhaps a pgbench run
with lots of concurrent runs of a some very long query would do the trick.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2022-08-08 15:37:41 Re: [PATCH] CF app: add "Returned: Needs more interest"
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2022-08-08 15:33:44 Re: Remaining case where reltuples can become distorted across multiple VACUUM operations