From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Policy on cross-posting to multiple lists |
Date: | 2019-01-10 17:47:03 |
Message-ID: | 3281.1547142423@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Dean Rasheed (dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> Has the policy on cross-posting to multiple lists been hardened recently?
> So, the short answer is 'yes'.
> Perhaps that hasn't been getting through to people...?
If this was publicly announced anywhere, I didn't see it.
I would have pushed back if I had. CC'ing -hackers on a reply to
a bug report is something I do all the time, and I do not think
it'd be a good idea to stop doing so, nor to make the thread
disappear from the -bugs archives.
I'm quite on board with the need to reduce useless cross-posting,
but this is not the solution.
Maybe there could be a different rule for initial submissions
(one list only) than follow-ups (can add lists)?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-01-10 17:56:36 | Re: speeding up planning with partitions |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-01-10 17:34:13 | Re: Policy on cross-posting to multiple lists |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2019-01-10 18:19:47 | Re: Policy on cross-posting to multiple lists |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-01-10 17:34:13 | Re: Policy on cross-posting to multiple lists |