Re: Policy on cross-posting to multiple lists

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Policy on cross-posting to multiple lists
Date: 2019-01-10 17:47:03
Message-ID: 3281.1547142423@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Dean Rasheed (dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> Has the policy on cross-posting to multiple lists been hardened recently?

> So, the short answer is 'yes'.
> Perhaps that hasn't been getting through to people...?

If this was publicly announced anywhere, I didn't see it.
I would have pushed back if I had. CC'ing -hackers on a reply to
a bug report is something I do all the time, and I do not think
it'd be a good idea to stop doing so, nor to make the thread
disappear from the -bugs archives.

I'm quite on board with the need to reduce useless cross-posting,
but this is not the solution.

Maybe there could be a different rule for initial submissions
(one list only) than follow-ups (can add lists)?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-01-10 17:56:36 Re: speeding up planning with partitions
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-01-10 17:34:13 Re: Policy on cross-posting to multiple lists

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2019-01-10 18:19:47 Re: Policy on cross-posting to multiple lists
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-01-10 17:34:13 Re: Policy on cross-posting to multiple lists