Re: Outdated comments about proc->sem in lwlock.c

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Outdated comments about proc->sem in lwlock.c
Date: 2021-07-07 20:48:16
Message-ID: 3270B583-C8D8-4F7C-A461-827DF4CFE946@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 3 Jun 2021, at 04:07, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Here's a patch to remove the misleading comments.

While not an expert in the area; reading the referenced commit and the code
with the now removed comments, I think this is correct.

--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-07-07 21:32:59 Re: Replace remaining castNode(…, lfirst(…)) and friends calls with l*_node()
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-07-07 20:24:06 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum