Re: Discussion on missing optimizations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Discussion on missing optimizations
Date: 2017-10-08 16:24:50
Message-ID: 32646.1507479890@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Okay, that makes sense, thanks for explanation. Your patch is the way to
> go then.

Hearing no further comment, pushed. Thanks for reviewing it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2017-10-08 16:36:23 is possible cache tupledesc templates in execution plan? significant performance issue, maybe bug?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-10-08 16:18:04 Re: Discussion on missing optimizations