Re: computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared
Date: 2018-06-07 19:27:08
Message-ID: 32633.1528399628@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> If we're going to compress the protocol, it seems sensible to remove
> extraneous information first.

Breaking the wire protocol was nowhere in this thread.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2018-06-07 19:34:39 Re: computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2018-06-07 19:24:41 Re: computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared