Re: no "+" operator for smallint and bigint

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc(at)mega-bucks(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: no "+" operator for smallint and bigint
Date: 2003-02-24 14:59:44
Message-ID: 3258.1046098784@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 08:19:20PM +0900, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
>> PG=3D# select 8::smallint + 8::bigint;
>> ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '+' for types 'smallint' and 'bigi=
> nt'

> Since there is no explicit operator it doesn't know if the result should be
> a smallint or a bigint so it's asking you to tell it.

More specifically, the parser finds two equally plausible choices: cast the
smallint to int and apply "int4 + int8", or cast the smallint to bigint
and apply "int8 + int8". Not knowing which to prefer, it has to punt.

> Well, it not quite a straight forward problem and there has been much
> discussion about how to solve it.

That's an understatement :-(.

I currently like the idea of getting rid of as many cross-datatype
operators as possible --- offering a native "int4 + int8" operator
doesn't seem to have any obvious benefit over letting the parser
insert a promotion. But there are some pitfalls in that idea too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-02-24 15:51:34 Re: A few questions to real pgsql gurus
Previous Message Justin Clift 2003-02-24 14:33:38 Re: A few questions to real pgsql gurus