"Gunnar \"Nick\" Bluth" <gunnar(dot)bluth(at)pro-open(dot)de> writes:
> N.B. though that I've not had this issue when doing exactly the same
> stuff on 9.3, hence the bug report. Might be worth a footnote in the
> release notes (i.e., _if_ e.g. the failing assertion has been introduced
> w/ 9.4).
No, that assert came in with parameterized paths in 9.2. Not clear why
you'd be seeing it only now, unless maybe you were running non-assert
builds before?
regards, tom lane