Re: Why is parula failing?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Tharakan, Robins" <tharar(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is parula failing?
Date: 2024-03-27 05:28:19
Message-ID: 3232633.1711517299@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Unfortunately, REL_16_STABLE does not have the additional debugging,
> so don't get to know what reltuples was set to.

Let's wait a bit to see if it fails in HEAD ... but if not, would
it be reasonable to back-patch the additional debugging output?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2024-03-27 05:35:04 Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Previous Message shveta malik 2024-03-27 05:25:29 Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation