Re: Unicode escapes with any backend encoding

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unicode escapes with any backend encoding
Date: 2020-01-14 21:25:00
Message-ID: 32278.1579037100@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 4:25 AM Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> wrote:
>> On 1/14/20 10:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> to me that this error is just useless pedantry. As long as the DB
>>> encoding can represent the desired character, it should be transparent
>>> to users.

>> That's my position too.

> and mine.

I'm confused --- yesterday you seemed to be against this idea.
Have you changed your mind?

I'll gladly go change the patch if people are on board with this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-01-14 21:34:10 Re: Remove libpq.rc, use win32ver.rc for libpq
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-01-14 21:21:57 Re: planner support functions: handle GROUP BY estimates ?