Re: UNDO and in-place update

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: UNDO and in-place update
Date: 2016-11-23 04:45:57
Message-ID: 32256.1479876357@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> writes:
> The best thing by far about an alternative design like this is that it
> performs *consistently*.

Really? I think it just moves the issues somewhere else.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2016-11-23 04:49:06 Re: UNDO and in-place update
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-11-23 04:37:33 Re: UNDO and in-place update