Re: PG12 change to DO UPDATE SET column references

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG12 change to DO UPDATE SET column references
Date: 2024-01-20 22:57:46
Message-ID: 3212457.1705791466@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 12:59 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> A HINT if the bogus column name (1) matches the relation name and
>> (2) is field-qualified seems plausible to me. Then it's pretty
>> likely to be a user misunderstanding about whether to write the
>> relation name.

> Attached is a patch to do just that. We could also add tests for
> regular UPDATEs if you think that's useful.

Pushed with minor alterations:

1. I think our usual style for conditional hints is to use a ternary
expression within the ereport, rather than duplicating code. In this
case that way allows not touching any of the existing lines, making
review easier.

2. I thought we should test the UPDATE case as well as the ON CONFLICT
case, but I didn't think we needed quite as many tests as you had
here. I split up the responsibility so that one test covers the
alias case and the other the no-alias case.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-01-20 22:59:48 Re: Make documentation builds reproducible
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-01-20 22:44:00 Re: Make documentation builds reproducible