| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matthew Planchard <msplanchard(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Dealing with SeqScans when Time-based Partitions Cut Over |
| Date: | 2025-12-19 07:47:48 |
| Message-ID: | 31beb34c3108173ea386d567de92da720da4bb07.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 2025-12-18 at 13:48 -0500, Matthew Planchard wrote:
> In a table with high insert frequency (~1.5k rows/s) and high query
> frequency (~1k queries/s), partitioned by record creation time, we have
> observed the following behavior:
>
> * When the current time crosses a partition boundary, all new records
> are written to the new partition, which was previously empty, as
> expected
>
> * Because the planner's latest knowledge of the partition was based on
> its state prior to the cutover, it assumes the partition is empty and
> creates plans that use sequential scans
>
> * The table accumulates tens to hundreds of thousands of rows, and the
> sequentail scans start to use nearly 100% of available database CPU
>
> * Eventually the planner updates thee stats and all is well, but the
> cycle repeats the next time the partitions cut over.
>
> We have tried setting up a cron job that runs ANALYZE on the most recent
> partition of the table every 15 seconds at the start of the hour, and
> while this does help in reducing the magnitude and duration of the
> problem, it is insufficient to fully resolve it (our engineers are still
> getting daily pages for high DB CPU utilization).
>
> We have considered maintaining a separate connection pool with
> connections that have `enable_seqscan` set to `off`, and updating the
> application to use that pool for these queries, but I was hoping the
> community might have some better suggestions.
I would try to tune autovacuum to check more often:
autovacuum_naptime = 5s # perhaps even less
Then hopefully the new partitions get analyzed early enough.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew | 2025-12-19 08:26:17 | Re: wal segment size |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2025-12-19 07:43:06 | Re: PQexecPrepared() question |