| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: redis_fdw failure on crake |
| Date: | 2025-07-22 14:02:57 |
| Message-ID: | 31a47b21-3fd9-402e-8373-5b4de31796a2@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-07-22 Tu 1:54 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 12:12:25PM +0900, Richard Guo wrote:
>> After pushing commit e2debb643 I noticed redis_fdw failure on crake.
>>
>> +ERROR: failed to connect to Redis: 1
>> +CONTEXT: SQL statement "select (select count(*) from db15) +
>> + (select count(*) from db15_hash) +
>> + (select count(*) from db15_set) +
>> + (select count(*) from db15_list) +
>> + (select count(*) from db15_zset)"
>> +PL/pgSQL function inline_code_block line 5 at SQL statement
>>
>> This same failure occurred three days ago as well. It seems that
>> connecting to Redis has been unstable recently.
> That's unrelated to your commit, stable branches of crake are red as
> well.
Yes, fallout from a system upgrade. Fixed, now, sorry for the noise.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vitale, Anthony, Sony Music | 2025-07-22 14:03:23 | RE: Question on any plans to use the User Server/User Mapping to provide Logical Replication Subscriptions the user/password in an encrypted manner |
| Previous Message | Andrei Lepikhov | 2025-07-22 14:01:15 | Re: Memory consumed by paths during partitionwise join planning |