Re: [PATCH] dtrace probes for memory manager

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dtrace probes for memory manager
Date: 2009-12-08 21:06:37
Message-ID: 31B1AA175A835D38186E8773@amenophis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On 8. Dezember 2009 15:51:52 -0500 Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:

> Try this instead, which will give you a test where checkpoints have a
> minimal impact, but lots of memory will be thrown around:
>
> pgbench -i -s 10 <db>
> pgbench -S -c 10 -T 600 <db>

Thanks for the input, will try....

--
Thanks

Bernd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2009-12-08 21:12:44 Re: ECPG patch 2, SQLDA support
Previous Message Greg Smith 2009-12-08 20:51:52 Re: [PATCH] dtrace probes for memory manager