Re: BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Christian Almeida <cbalmeida(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values
Date: 2015-04-06 18:52:18
Message-ID: 31955.1428346338@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'll let a hacker determine whether this is a bug or a feature request
> though it is a POLA violation in either case.

I'd say it's a feature request --- a perfectly reasonable one, but I doubt
we'd alter the behavior of the function in the back branches.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tgarnett 2015-04-06 19:21:30 BUG #12990: Missing pg_multixact/members files (appears to have wrapped, then truncated)
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2015-04-06 18:33:51 Re: BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Emre Hasegeli 2015-04-06 19:36:33 Re: BRIN range operator class
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2015-04-06 18:39:58 Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.