| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Subject: | Re: Opossum vs. float4 NaN |
| Date: | 2019-01-27 14:56:39 |
| Message-ID: | 31907.1548600999@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> I guess the main question is; does anybody care about builds on a 20 year old netbsd/mipsel dinosaur? I noticed there are now mips64el and mips64eb build-farm members.
I tend to think that variety in the buildfarm is intrinsically a good
thing. I'd rather see you continue to run the thing, perhaps with a
newer netbsd version if that will resolve the problem.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-01-27 15:17:43 | Re: Allowing extensions to supply operator-/function-specific info |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-01-27 13:33:01 | Re: A few new options for vacuumdb |