Re: Opossum vs. float4 NaN

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: Opossum vs. float4 NaN
Date: 2019-01-27 14:56:39
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> I guess the main question is; does anybody care about builds on a 20 year old netbsd/mipsel dinosaur?  I noticed there are now mips64el and mips64eb build-farm members.

I tend to think that variety in the buildfarm is intrinsically a good
thing. I'd rather see you continue to run the thing, perhaps with a
newer netbsd version if that will resolve the problem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-01-27 15:17:43 Re: Allowing extensions to supply operator-/function-specific info
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-01-27 13:33:01 Re: A few new options for vacuumdb