Re: LLVM 22

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>
Subject: Re: LLVM 22
Date: 2026-04-02 03:31:37
Message-ID: 3184815.1775100697@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 4:25 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Working on this, more shortly... I'm trying to figure out if Anthonin
>> and Andres's feedback means the poison approach does nothing useful
>> and we might as well just #ifdef out the lifetime.end stuff for LLVM
> = 22 to fix the breakage today.

> Done. Hopefully midge and Devrim will now turn green :-)

Just out of curiosity: I see you back-patched that all the way,
but midge had only been failing on v18 and HEAD. Were you just
being defensive, or is there something deeper there?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Henson Choi 2026-04-02 03:51:05 Re: Row pattern recognition
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2026-04-02 03:20:59 RE: [PROPOSAL] Termination of Background Workers for ALTER/DROP DATABASE