| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Redundant/mis-use of _(x) gettext macro? |
| Date: | 2026-04-02 03:18:29 |
| Message-ID: | 3183009.1775099909@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Apr 2, 2026, at 10:55, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 10:52 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
>>> No, you feel wrong -- this is necessary so that the translator has
>>> control over the quoting style of a list of items. Not all translations
>>> use double quoting. Some examples from different language files:
> Yep, good to learn. Noted.
This and related message style matters are covered in our docs, in
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/error-style-guide.html
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2026-04-02 03:20:41 | Re: LLVM 22 |
| Previous Message | Chao Li | 2026-04-02 03:11:04 | Re: Redundant/mis-use of _(x) gettext macro? |